Now Playing Tracks

Bullshit. All the atheists that theists find to be “spiteful and pushy” are simply those who don’t back down when they’re being discriminated against or proselytized to. Someone like Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris aren’t necessarily spiteful and pushy, but rather speak their minds and attempt to push for logical thinking, keeping religion out of public schools, and hold governments to a secular standard. Religious people need to get over the idea that anyone who opposes their absolutely idiotic world view is “oppressing” them. There’s a huge difference between promoting religious neutrality, such as keeping a science classroom secular, versus attempting to abolish one’s right to believe in a deity.

Some of these submissions to that blog are just ridiculous.

muchtoocynical:

paxamericana:

ouafouaf:

sonofapritch:

harunwasagoon:

thedailywhat:

This Might Not End Well of the Day: The offices of Paris-based satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo were firebombed last week after it posted a caricature of the prophet Muhammad on the cover of an issue criticising the rise of Sharia law in the post-Arab Spring Middle East.

The weekly quickly rebounded with the help of local authorities, and its next issue is set to hit newsstands this Wednesday.

However, rather than tone down its firebomb-inducing irreverence in light of the recent attack, Charlie Hebdo has decided instead to double down by running a front-page cartoon depicting Muhammad making out with the publication’s editor, Charb, beneath the words “love is stronger than hate.”

To the employees of Charlie Hebdo: Now would be a good time to invest in bulletproof everything.

[bi / fark.]

“To the employees of Charlie Hebdo: Now would be a good time to invest in bulletproof everything.”

Count on the ignorant dumbfucks from the daily what to bolster european xenophobia/islamophobia

this is gross

ugh it’s like you don’t get teh joke which is so funny but you have things like culture and thinking that get in the way

trigger warning

Oh neat, what an edgy way to piss off extremists/Muslims (although why bother differentiating, eh). Because it’s not like, oh you know, the average Muslim would take offense to this. And it would be even more unthinkable to propose that said ‘average’ Muslims could react sans brutish violence; it’s an inherent behavior within the religion—all religion, if you ask my favorite philosopher and personal hero Dawkins (pbuh).

Intentionally baiting extremists so that you can then portray their reactions as a reflection of an entire religion and all of its followers, cool, awesome, great journalism.

^^^ Commentary. The Daily What is shit. 

Facepalms everywhere

The commentary is absolutely ridiculous. If this publication was using an image of Jesus kissing a man to promote the idea that Christianity and its followers need to stop with the hatred, shaming, and leading teenagers to live closeted lives that sometimes lead to suicide… what would people say? That they’re intentionally baiting Christians to attack the magazine? Even if that were the case, the message is clear. I would be SHOCKED to find out Christians decided to fire bomb this publication for a similar image that mocked THEIR religion.

People, even atheists, are so unbelievably defensive of Islam and have the mentality of, “Well, you had it coming if you piss them off”. What sort of bullshit is this? Hate and violence in the name of religion is no different when it comes from Muslims. Freedom of speech allows us to publish things like this, whether or not you agree with it.

Stop fucking sticking up for the Muslims when you won’t even hesitate to bash on Fundamentalist Christians and all the hate they create. Seriously. I’m fucking sick of people giving Islam a bunch of excuses while they attack Christianity in return. No religion is free from opposition and no religion is free from criticism that they’ll find derogatory and offensive.

(Source: thedailywhat)

“As our nation faces challenging times, it is appropriate … to firmly declare our trust in God, believing that it will sustain us for generations to come”

majere616:

sageoflogic:

rationalitynotfantasy:

Hey. Hey you. Yea, I’m looking at you Congress.

FUCK YOU.

It’s like the Cold War all over again.

Pretty much. I find it absolutely ridiculous that people are so blind to what the Establishment Clause states. I don’t understand how anyone who supports or understands the separation of church and state, and WHY it exists, can support this action. Not only is it a horrible waste of time when Congress should be working to fix all our damn problems, but it shows how much of a preference the Christian faith still has in the public sector.

School >_<

I normally don’t rant about things from my personal life on here that don’t have to deal with religion, but I pretty much just needed somewhere to vent. Feel free to keep reading if you want, but I’m not really expecting anything out of this.

I’ve come to the realization that the major that I was originally pursuing isn’t going to happen. I’m currently failing a stats class because of a horrific professor, and failing this stats class pushes my schooling back a couple years because it’s a significant pre-requisite that’s only offered in the fall. My professor’s lecture, homework, and exams don’t match up at all. After attending every lecture, I think that I have a grasp on what he’s trying to show us. Then I look at the homework, and he goes ahead and throws a bunch of crazy things on there that don’t match up with the lecture notes. On top of that, he throws in a bunch of crazy calculus that I’ve never seen in my life. So I go to his office hours and try to get help, and I feel like I’m able to complete the homework. Upon getting my homework back, I’ve averaged about a 35% for my homework grade. The exception being the 81% I managed because the one homework assignment matched up with the lecture. When the first exam came around, I decided to study all my homework and notes as what I’d think to expect on the exam. When it came time to do the exam, it was almost as if it was completely foreign to what he had shown in lecture and on the homework. There was one question, which no one got right, that we hadn’t seen in any part of the class.

The worst part about this is that he has so much tenure at the school that nothing will come from people complaining about him. I’ve heard stories from people who have had them in past, and they’ve tried to take it up with their advisers, the dean, and so forth. Somehow, he’s still teaching… even with failing test scores.

There is a bright side to all of this though. Because of certain classes only being offered in the spring, I needed to fill my schedule with some recommended electives. In this case, I decided to take all of the economics electives. What did I learn from taking these? That my economics classes are the only classes that I’ve truly enjoyed since being in college and that I’ll be going for my economics degree now. I’m still pissed that I’m failing a class though…

Replacing $1 bill with coin could save $5.6 billion

muchtoocynical:

shortformblog:

A proposal to phase out the $1 bill and replace it with a $1 coin could be gaining currency as the “supercommittee” looks to find ways to save the government money.

Now that’s CHANGE we can believe in! Zing! Conan, you need any writers?

In all seriousness, this seems like a largely reasonable proposal that, like all reasonable proposals, has a few interest groups working against it. For example, the armored car lobby—which you’d probably never thought about prior to reading this sentence—is opposed to switching over to coins, as that would make their truckload heavier and cost them more on gas.

I guess the reasoning is, the coins last longer? I mean, I’d imagine bills are much cheaper to make, but the coins must last long enough to outweigh the costs of manufacturing them.

I could jump on board with this idea. Pair this with phasing out the penny, and you’re saving the government a lot of money for relatively no hassle.

Exhuming my Blog

guyagainstreligion:

I failed at coming back to life the last time I tried, but due to recent events I think I’ll be posting here a lot more now.

For one, I have a conclusive ending with my supervisor from work. A few weeks ago, I wore my inverted cross necklace outside of my shirt (which is technically only a problem because anything that dangles can be caught in a moving conveyor), and he absolutely flipped out at me. He told me if I didn’t take it off and throw it away right then, he would go to the highest administrative level and seek retribution to its full extent.

He attacked me such fervor that I admit I was completely taken back initially, but then managed to laugh it off and tell him to calm down. It actually became quite a huge ordeal throughout the rest of the day. Another supervisor eventually stole his attention and I continued to work with my necklace hanging out, despite the fact that it was against the rules (again, simply because it was dangling, not for what it symbolized). I suppose I was feeling pretty obstinate at this point.

After a while, my other, much more laid-back supervisor came over to me laughing, saying “I heard you pissed <name> off. Can I see it?” I showed him and he just started laughing, highly amused. “He’s such a hypocrite,” he said. “If you were wearing a regular crucifix he wouldn’t have minded, and this is no different. You’re just representing your beliefs. However, I do have to ask you to tuck it in or make it a choker because we can’t wear dangling jewellery.” With that, I did tuck it in because I felt the reason was much more just.

During break, Zealot (who I’ll call him for the rest of this post), was overheard telling people that I was “instigating” and being offensive on purpose. That I had slapped him in the face, and essentially told him to “f*ck his mother.” I couldn’t help but laugh once again.

Later on, I saw him pointing angrily in my direction at a higher-up who just threw his hands up in defense, shook his head, and walked away leaving Zealot standing there fuming. He walked by me very aggressively, pointed his roll of papers at me, and said “Jesus Killer,” with the meanest glare I’ve seen anyone give in a while.

I learned that he went around to everyone on the boxline and told them that I was insulting him, and that I was a horrible person. Every single person. A lot of them just said, “freedom of religion, right?” Some of them just got really quiet around me, a few more laughed, and one exceptional individual stopped me on the way to get a drink to say, “so I hear you pissed Zealot off. I just want to let you know that I was raised Catholic my whole life, and we’re not all like that. You can wear whatever you want, man.” I told him that meant a lot to me, thanked him, and shook his hand.

A few days later Zealot started talking to me again, and I told him that he had been jamming his religion down my throat every day since he learned I’m an Atheist. Wearing a necklace that signified how I felt about it is far less abrasive in the end then constantly trying to convince me that I’m going to Hell, and that every bad thing that happens to me is “the work of Satan.” He looked defeated for a moment, and just said “hey man, I’ve just been messing around - Jesus Killer,” he said with a forced smirk.

So for a few days, “Jesus Killer” was my nickname, in all of its irony that I trust I don’t have to explain here, mostly due to the fact that this has already become long-winded. In the end, that was about the last time anything to do with God was mentioned.

Anyway, thanks to everyone who still follows me, and I think I really will be more active now.

my AP govt teacher might give extra credit for going to the local Occupy Protest

anticapitalist:

rationalitynotfantasy:

anticapitalist:

fuck yes.

As awesome as I think this is, I really can’t agree with this. To me, this is no different than a teacher giving out extra credit for attending a Tea Party rally or an anti-choice protest. Teachers, especially those teaching AP Gov, should feel free to make their political affiliations known and allow the students to enter into debates. The teacher shouldn’t be pushing their political agenda, especially with the bribe of extra credit.

I just think it’s wrong.

she said we get extra credit for anything participating in the political process, and someone in my class asked if protests count, and she said yes.

Now that makes more sense. In that case, I don’t have a problem with it. With the way you originally said it, I thought the teacher was specifically targeting the Occupy protests.

my AP govt teacher might give extra credit for going to the local Occupy Protest

anticapitalist:

fuck yes.

As awesome as I think this is, I really can’t agree with this. To me, this is no different than a teacher giving out extra credit for attending a Tea Party rally or an anti-choice protest. Teachers, especially those teaching AP Gov, should feel free to make their political affiliations known and allow the students to enter into debates. The teacher shouldn’t be pushing their political agenda, especially with the bribe of extra credit.

I just think it’s wrong.

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union